DOI:https://doi.org/10.3232/SJSS.2019.V9.N3.03

Oinez Basoa: Using school-managed afforested land for soil education in Navarre, Spain

Iñigo Virto, Bosco Imbert, Javier Peralta, Isabel de Soto, Iñaki González-Tejedor, Rodrigo Antón, Irene López-Goñi, Maite Martínez, Isabel Arias, Alberto Enrique

Abstract

The study of soils in secondary education is a topic of debate because it remains little considered in official curricula and programs at pre-university education, despite the increasing concern about soil in environmental studies. In this work, we present the results of a case-study conducted with a class of the 4th grade of compulsory secondary education (10th school year), where a didactic sequence was used that included actual data obtained in an afforestation chronosequence. The afforestation was part of the activities conducted by the network of schools to which the school belonged, with the aim of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions resulting from their annual fund-raising event. In a first step, a series of indicators related to soil and vegetation were determined in the afforested soil using a space-for-time approach with a nearby cultivated soil (corresponding to the original situation of the afforested soil) and a mature forest (similar to the target situation of the afforested land). Plant biodiversity, soil microbial biomass C and total organic C, and organic matter decomposition indicators were determined and observed to be in an intermediate situation in the afforested land between the cultivated soil and the mature forest, seven years after afforestation. In particular, an effective atmospheric C sequestration was verified from a difference of 12.41 ± 1.06 Mg of organic C per hectare in the afforested soil compared to the cultivated control. Data issued from this analysis were used to prepare a collaborative jigsawactivity that was integrated into the didactic sequence designed to introduce the concepts of ecosystem successions and the carbon cycle. This project had a special focus on the role of soil both as a component of the ecosystem and within the carbon cycle. The success of the implementation of this sequence was tested using an initial and final test. The results of these tests showed a general improvement (42.8 points in the final test vs 23.3 in the initial test) in relation to the concepts tested. However, differences were observed in relation to the progression done by the students, which was better for ecosystems than for soil, likely as a consequence of the poor previous knowledge. From those results, we conclude that the development of educational tools that allow secondary school students to address real cases in which the soil is considered as a key component of the ecosystem can be effective in moving towards meaningful learning about soils and soil properties, since these seem still poorly understood by secondary school students.

Views: 115
Downloads PDF: 55

 

References


Alcalde-Aparicio S. 2015. Boost momentum and outreach of Soil Science in 2015, International Year of Soils (I YS2015). Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 23.3:330-343. [In Spanish].

Álvarez LSJ, Vega N, Mora EDC, Jaramillo NDF, Miquitama PQ. 2019. Learning teaching styles and strategies of university students of soil science. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa 21 (10.24320/redie.2019.21.e04.1935). [In Spanish].

Apesteguía M, Plante A, Virto I. 2018. Methods assessment for organic and inorganic carbon quantification in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean region. Geoderma Regional 12:39-48.

Aronson E, Blaney N, Stephan C, Sikes J, Snapp M. 1978. The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage Publications.

Ayuntamiento de Vitoria – Gasteizko Udala. 2019. Programa de Conservación de Suelos. Guía de identificación de macrofauna. [cited 2019 May 4]. Available from: https://www.vitoria-gasteiz.org/docs/wb021/contenidosEstaticos/adjuntos/es/35/99/83599.pdf.

Badía D. 2008. El suelo como herramienta didáctica. II Seminario del Geoparque de Sobrarbe. Investigación Geológica y Recursos Didácticos. Boltaña, Huesca, Spain. [In Spanish].

Bosch-Serra AD, Estudillos G, Yagiie MR, Virgili JM. 2016. Digital tools in soil science related field studies: Training support and lifelong learning. Span J Soil Sci 6(3):159-175.

Brevik EC, Steffan JJ, Rodrigo-Comino J, Neubert D, Burgess LC, Cerdà A. 2019. Connecting the public with soil to improve human health. Eur J Soil Sci. 70(4):898-910.

Brevik EC, Vaughan KL, Parikh SJ, Dolliver H, Lindbo D, Steffan JJ, Weindorf DC, McDaniel P, Mbila M, Edinger-Marshall S. 2018. Trends in undergraduate soil science education at selected universities in the USA from 2009 to 2013. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 82(2):295-306.

Churchman GJ. 2010. The philosophical status of soil science. Geoderma 157:214-221.

Cohen W, Strohl C. 2019. The soil story curriculum. Rebuilding Healthy Soil for Carbon Cycle Balance. Ed. Kiss the Ground Foundation and Life Lab. [cited 2019 July 24]. Available from: https://kisstheground.com/education-program/#curriculum

Cunningham SC, Mac Nally R, Baker PJ, Cavagnaro TR, Beringer J, Thomson JR, Thomson RM. 2015. Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural Regions. Persp Plant Eco Evol System 17:301-317.

Diochon A, Basiliko N, Krzic M, Yates TT, Olson E, Masse J. 2017. Profiling undergraduate soil science education in Canada: Status and projected trends. Can J Soil Sci. 97(2):122-132.

Djukic I, Kepfer-Rojas S, Kappel-Schmidt I, Larsen KS, Beier C, Berg B, Verheyene K. 2018. Early stage litter decomposition across biomes. Sci Total Environ. 628-629:1369-1394.

Dominati E, Patterson M, Mcay A. 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econom. 69:1858-1868.

EIP-AGRI (Agriculture and Innovation). 2014. Creating diverse forests with multiple benefits. What can forests offer you? [cited 2019 July 24]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_brochure_forestry_2014_en_web_1.pdf

Fernández A, Sesto V, García-Rodeja I. 2017. Secondary students’ mental models about the soil. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 35.2: 127-145. [In Spanish].

Field DJ, Koppi AJ, Jarrett LE, Abbott LK, Cattle SR, Grant CD, McBratney A, Menzies NW, Weatherley AJ. 2011. Soil Science teaching principles. Geoderma 167-168:9-14.

Francek M. 2013. A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. Int J Sci Educ. 35(1):31-64.

Gutiérrez-Rodríguez L, Hogarth NJ, Zhou W, Zhang K, Putzel L. 2016. China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects. Environ Evid. (2016):5-21.

Hallett SH, Caird SP. 2017. Soil-Net: Development and impact of innovative, open, online soil science educational resources. Soil Sci. 182(5):188-201.

Hartemink AE, Balks MR, Chen Z-S, Drohan P, Field DJ, Krasilnikov P, Lowe DJ, Rabenhorst M, van Rees K, Schad P, Schipper LA, Sonneveld M, Walter C. 2014. The joy of teaching soil science. Geoderma 217-218:1-9.

Hartemink AE, McBratney A. 2008. A soil science renaissance. Geoderma 148:123-129.

Hayhoe D, MacIntyre J, Bullock S. 2016. Soil science education for Grades K-12 in Canada. Can J Soil Sci. 96(3):336-345.

Hellgren JM, Lindberg S. 2017. Motivating students with authentic science experiences: changes in motivation for school science. Res Sci Technol Educ. 35(4):409-426.

Herrada RI, Baños R. 2018. Aprendizaje cooperativo a través de las nuevas tecnologías: una revisión. Revista d’Innovació Educativa 20:16-25. [In Spanish].

IGME (Instituto Geológico y Minero de España). 1987. Mapa Geológico de España 1:50.000. Hoja 173 (Tafalla) y 206 (Peralta). [cited 2018 September 14]. Available from: http://www.igme.es/infoigme/catalogo/catalogo.aspx?tab=0

Ikaselkar. 2017. Biologia eta Geologia 4 DBH. Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain: Series EKI Proiektua. [In Basque].

Johnson DW, Johnson R, Holubec E. 2013. Cooperation in the classroom (9th ed.). Edina, MN, USA: Interaction Book Company.

Kali Y, Levy KS, Levin-Peled R, Tal T. 2018. Supporting outdoor inquiry learning (SOIL): Teachers as designers of mobile-assisted seamless learning. Brit J Educ Technol. 49(6):1145-1161.

Keuskamp JA, Dingemans BJ, Lehtinen T, Sarneel JM, Hefting MM. 2013. Tea Bag Index: a novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods Ecol Evol. 4:1070-1075.

Klute A, editor. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis: Parts 1&2 —Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5.1. Madison, WI, USA: SSSA, ASA.

Kurganova I, Merino A, Lopes de Gerenyu V., Barros N, Kalinina O, Giani L, Kuzyakov Y. 2019. Mechanisms of carbon sequestration and stabilization by restoration of arable soils after abandonment: A chronosequence study on Phaeozems and Chernozems. Geoderma 354:113882.

Lal R, Follett F, Stewart BA, Kimble JM. 2007. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Sci. 172(12):943-956.

Margenot AJ, Alldritt K, Southard S, O'Geen A. 2016. Integrating soil science into primary school curricula: Students promote soil science education with Dig It! The Secrets of Soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 80(4):831-838.

Martínez-Peña MB, Gil-Quílez MJ, de la Gándara M. 2016. Contribution of experiences to the construction of models: the soil as a system. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 24.2:182-189. [In Spanish].

MECD (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte). 2014. Real Decreto 126/2014, de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria. [cited 2019 July 25]. Available from: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2014/BOE-A-2014-2222-consolidado.pdf [In Spanish].

MECD (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte). 2015. Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato. [cited 2019 July 25]. Available from: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2015/01/03/pdfs/BOE-A-2015-37.pdf [In Spanish].

NIE (Nafarroako Ikastolen Elkartea). 2019. ¿Qué es Oinez Basoa? [cited 2019 July 24]. Available from: http://www.nafarroaoinez.eus/basoa/indexES.asp. [In Spanish].

Norman AG, editor. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agron. Monogr. 9.2. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, SSSA.

Peralta J, Biurrun I, García-Mijangos I, Remón JL, Olano JM, Lorda M, Loidi J, Campos JA. 2013. Manual de hábitats de Navarra. Departamento de Desarrollo Rural, Medio Ambiente y Administración Local. Pamplona, Spain: Gobierno de Navarra. [In Spanish].

Pickett STA. 1989. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE, editor. Long-term studies in ecology. New York, NY, USA: Springer.

Rasmussen C, Heckman K, Wieder WR, Keiluweit M, Lawrence CR, Berbe AA, Blankinship, JC, Crow S, Druhan JL, Pries CEH, Marin-Spiotta E, Plante AF, Schadel C, Schimel JP, Sierra CA, Thompson A, Wagai R. 2018. Beyond clay: towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content. Biogeochemistry 137:297-306.

Rebollo M, Prieto T, Brero V. 2005. Aproximación a la historia y epistemología del concepto de suelo: Implicaciones didácticas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias (Número extra: VII Congreso):1-5. [In Spanish].

Rodríguez-Martín JA, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Gonzalo J, Gil C, Ramos-Miras JJ, Grau-Corbí JM, Boluda R. 2016. Assessment of the soil organic carbon stock in Spain. Geoderma 264:117-125.

Rowley MC, Grand S, Verrecchia EP. 2018. Calcium-mediated stabilisation of soil organic carbon. Biogeochemistry 137:27-49.

Rumpel C, Amiraslani F, Chenu C, García-Cárdenas M, Kaonga M, Koutika L-S, Ladha J, Madari B, Shirato Y, Smith P, Soudi B, Soussana J-F, Whitehead D, Wollenberg, E. 2019. The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy. Ambio 2019:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2.

Sarneel J, Broneus F, van Hamersveld I, Carlbourg E. 2017. Teatime for Science. Teacher’s manual. Instructions & background material. [cited 2019 May 4]. Available from: http://www.teatime4science.org/wp-content/uploads/Teachers-manual_2017.pdf.

SECS (Sociedad Española de la Ciencia del Suelo). 2017. Libro Blanco sobre el tratamiento del suelo en los libros de texto de Enseñanza Secundaria Obligatoria y de Bachillerato en España. 2nd edition. Lleida, Spain: Diputació de Lleida.

Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 11th edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, D.C., USA: United States Department of Agriculture.

Stolbovoy V, Montanarella L, Filippi N. 2007. Soil sampling protocol to certify the changes of organic carbon stock in mineral soil of the European Union. Version 2. EUR 21576 EN/2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Tiessen H, Moir JO. 1993. Total and organic C. In: Carter MR, editor. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Ottawa, ON, Canada: CRC Press. p. 187-199.

Torkar G, Krasovec U. 2019. Students' attitudes toward forest ecosystem services, knowledge about ecology, and direct experience with forests. Ecosys Ser. 37:100916.

Vance ED, Brookes, PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 19:703-704.

Virto I, Imaz MJ, Fernández-Ugalde O, Urrutia I, Enrique A, Bescansa P. 2012. Soil quality evaluation following the implementation of permanent cover crops in semi-arid vineyards. Organic matter, physical and biological soil properties. Span J Agric Res. 10:1121-1132.

Yusof KM, Hassan SAHSS, Jamaludin MZ, Harun NF. 2012. Cooperative Problem-based Learning (CPBL): Framework for integrating Cooperative Learning and Problem-based Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sci. 56:223-232.

Zugazagoitia D, Villarroel JD. 2016. Studying the importance of soil organic matter: An educational proposal for secondary education. Educación Química 27:37-42. [In Spanish].





With the patronage of
Universia
Avda. de Cantabria, s/n - 28660, Boadilla del Monte
Madrid, España